RickCook

Cleaning Out The Turkey Coop: What To Do After You Get Rid of an Incompetent Employee

by RickCook ‎08-11-2012 08:00 AM - edited ‎07-11-2012 03:27 PM

turkey_dreamstimefree_58844.jpg

Into each IT department, some turkeys must fall. You do the best you can to screen employees before you hire them so that you get people who are competent, well-trained, and committed, but occasionally you make a mistake. Sometimes you hire someone who just doesn't work out. Eventually, you get rid of that person. You issue a department-wide email using the phrase, “pursue other career opportunities,” you change passwords, you delete administrative access, and you breathe a sigh of relief.

Don't sigh too deeply just yet. An incompetent, discontented, or malicious employee often leaves a trail of problems. Some of them will be obvious (which is why you got rid of the person in the first place), but other issues are likely to stay hidden until they rise up to smack you, usually at a highly inconvenient moment.

After letting the turkey go, most IT managers focus on security issues, which is where you've got to start. (See below for some security-related things to do.) But the problem here usually isn't malice. Most failed employees aren't malicious. They're just incompetent, lazy, uncommitted, or trying to slide by with the minimum work.

As a result, in addition to the security issues, you need to discover what the turkey was doing – or not doing.

Don’t Trust Anything the Turkey “Finished”

“In simplest terms, it's a matter of checking to see if things have been done or not,” says Ben Nettleton, content management and IT support at Global Healing Center in Houston, TX. “I can recall one situation where, after the person had moved on, we took a look at his To Do list. We found tasks that weren't done, which was a surprise because they were marked as done on his To Do list.”

IT compliance consultant Fredrick Trevor, of Frederick Trevor Consulting in Pleasanton, CA, agrees. “When someone does sloppy work, they may do fifty percent of the work that needs to be done, but not the other half,” he says.

The problem is the work that doesn't get done is usually the least obvious.

In examining the ex-employee's work, everything may look more or less okay on the surface, but underneath are major, nasty problems. These are the ones can rise up and bite you in the butt. The person added new users to the system as required, for instance, but for the past few months he didn’t bother to delete old users or close their accounts. If you're paying for your software licenses on a per-seat basis, this can get very expensive.

Don’t trust anything that the ex-employee did that relies on automation, anything that should happen on its own. Backups are an area that can cause serious problems. If the employee had responsibility for any backups, they need to be checked. “Make sure your backups are working,” says Gary Howe, a consultant based in Denver. “Are they actually working and not just firing off without any error messages? Until you do a restore, you don't know if you've got a functional backup,” he points out.

It's also important to check any outside relationships in which the former employee might have had a part. “Contracts are a big thing,” Howe says. “We had a woman in a previous position who had signed a multi-year contract. For a single T1 line they were paying $450 to $500 a month. Here in Denver, you can get a T1 for $200 a month.” Malicious? Probably not, but it was expensive nonetheless.

Often these employees took the easy way out, even if it was sub-optimal. For example, the person may have registered the company website in her own name rather than the company's, or may use his personal information in the WHOIS listing.

Optimizations are another vulnerable area, particularly if it was a database administrator you let go. It's easier for a bad employee to not bother with optimization – or even to take the time to set up a database correctly. This last is particularly troublesome; with databases, many of the “easiest ways to do things” run the company over a cliff as the number of entries grows, causing a drastic slowdown in performance. You may not realize this until months after the employee has departed… whereupon you want to bring her back in just to fire her all over again.

The basic lesson here is to go looking for trouble in the wake of the departed employee. Don't assume that he did everything he was supposed to, or that he did it efficiently.

This is particularly true, Nettleton says, of the last few months of the employee's tenure. “For that window of time, just take a look at anything that has autonomy involved,” he says.

The Obvious – and Not-So-Obvious – Security Sweeps

Then there is the whole area of security. “Take the appropriate steps to make sure the employee who's been let go cannot do any harm,” says Trevor. “That's the most important thing.”

In addition to deleting the ex-employee's account and removing administrative passwords and such, it's a good idea to go an extra mile with IT employees. That include running perimeter and server sweeps looking for processes or open accounts.

“Change all your passwords,” says Trevor. It's not a bad idea to have users change passwords as well, since many users unthinkingly give their password to anyone from IT who asks for it. “Make sure you have all the (physical) keys,” he adds.

Protecting outsourcing, vendor, and customer relationships is important as well. Inform all your contacts that the ex-employee is no longer with the company and is not entitled to any access.

Not all the security holes left behind are malicious. Some will be the result of sub-standard performance. The application the ex-employee was maintaining may run fine, for example, but the turkey didn’t add patches as they became available. If you don't look, you're likely to find this out when a bad guy drives through the big gaping holes in the un-patched application's security. Another common situation is that the ex-employee installed a desktop access program to make the job easier, whether or not the software was approved by IT.

And, of course, in some cases there is malice. This may not be common, but it's what keeps IT administrators awake nights. Someone who has been on the inside and had access to your system can be a lot more clever and more destructive than J Random Hacker who's trying to break in from the outside.

The good news is it's getting easier to spot malicious activity, thanks to new software. “This is becoming a lot easier to manage, because a lot of companies are installing robust data loss prevention systems,” says Gary Bahadur, CEO of KRAA Security in Miami, FL.

Don’t limit yourself to the obvious security holes. “For one of my clients, we were called in right after an IT admin left, and did a checkup,” Bahadur says. “All the perimeter devices seemed to be OK, the key servers were OK, but then we ran a basic ping sweep. A new desktop popped up in the department. Since all department systems were known, this seemed very suspicious. We tracked it down to under an unused desk. It was a desktop, covered by papers and boxes. It was allowing remote access to the network by running GotomyPC, letting that ex-employee get past all the firewall rules and access controls.”

“It was something so easy to do that could really have led to a major compromise of the network,” Bahadur adds.

While acts of malice by ex-employees may be rare, it can't be taken for granted that they won't happen. “I think most people who get called out (i.e. let go) probably just want to let it be,” says Nettleton. But he adds, “Would I inherently trust someone to do that? No.”

What practices have you learned, after the turkey is gone? Let’s talk about them in the comments.

See also:

Comments
by Shane(anon) on ‎08-11-2012 09:57 PM

Firstly, referring to a person as a "turkey" is both childish and demeaning. Who would want to work for a person who sees people in those terms anyway? Secondly, if work is going un-done then were is the supervisor/manager? Hopefully lining up in the same dole queue as the person they failed to supervise correctly.

by Random Fuckbaq(anon) on ‎08-11-2012 10:19 PM

You sound like an asshole.

 

Just saying.

by Welp Welpington(anon) on ‎08-11-2012 10:38 PM

I'm afraid that's three votes for sounding like a prick.

by Geoff C(anon) on ‎08-11-2012 10:51 PM

Vote #4, you indeed sound like an asshole.  +incompetent.

by Yikes(anon) on ‎08-11-2012 11:32 PM

Christ, what an as5hole.

by Mark Southcombe(anon) on ‎08-11-2012 11:49 PM

I just started reading the first couple of sentences and was overwhelemed with the feeling that the person who wrote this must be a complete twat, and sure enough scrolling down to the comments below I'm not the only one.

by Thomas Meleagris(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 12:11 AM

 “Are they actually working and not just firing off without any error messages? Until you do a restore, you don't know if you've got a functional backup,”

If you do not already know if your backups work, the "turkey" is not the programmer. Just sayin'

Oh, and what everyone else said.

by NoNoNo(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 12:33 AM

I believe that someone should be cleaning you out of the Turkey Coup. See above - vote #5.

by umyeah(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 01:29 AM

I don't think you're necessarily an asshole in real life, but you're certainly writing like one - one more vote.  The commentors are unanimous.  Maybe for your next article you can make amends by talking about how to attract good talents with a positive workplace?

by Johan du Preez(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 02:20 AM

You are a idiot its a wonder anyone works for you after you make them feel like a criminal in the interview process. If this tactics gets used when I apply for the job you will never hear back from me.

Take it as a wake up call the guy probably underperformed because you are a douche and pissed him of enough to not give a shit.

Take this as a wakeup call for yourself and sort your issues out. I would love to know your company name so that I can warn everyone to stay away.

by Mike Diderot(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 02:28 AM
Another twat vote here.
by nih(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 02:32 AM

I think the guy was trying to to give the article a light almost humerous tone. He failed and now comes across as an misogynistic ubercnut. BTW the failure of the initial hire and their subsequent failures in the workplace is the direct responsibility of their manager/supervisor

by Anonymous Coward(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 02:59 AM

You, Sir, are an imbecile.

by Mortain(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 03:45 AM

Despite the fact that all you say happens and there are people who do it, the way you write applies to anyone.

I am a Sys Admin and most of my job isn't documented because it was made for simple and efemerous tasks, or because just passed me to do it, or simply it won't be touched anymore. It may be seen by others that is undone work, in fact is time managing.

You speaked about backups, I was confronted with 3 types of backup managers before I came in to this position, some where replicated and ever was documented. The best after all? None of these were working. Now, I prefere to make my backup check manually every week or so.

There are people who weren't made to do some tasks, or were asked to do others and ever done it before, an IT cannot know everything and because they are people, they have faults, they must be checked. For this reason the IT department must be overviewed by an expert, and often it isn't.

 

One more vote.

by Shawn H Corey(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 05:56 AM

The best advice for any company: Learn the job of the man over you and teach your job to the man under you. -- We Were Soldiers

This gives you two advantages:

1) Your employees can (temporarily) fill in when an employee leaves.

2) An employee's work is scrunize as it is done, reducing the number of surprises later.

by YTroy(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 06:02 AM

As with the great number of comments above, you sound like an ignorant asshole and if I was one of the people quoted here, I would demand you retract pips drek...Enjoy your time as the 3rd shift help desk admin.

by the big Lebowski(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 08:51 AM

Yeah, well, you know, that's justlikeyour opinion man

by Longwalker(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 08:54 AM

Another vote for "Article author is an ass".

by Grisstle(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 09:55 AM

There is useful information here, but yeah you sound like an asshole all full of self-importance.

by Administrator on ‎09-11-2012 11:15 AM

Gentlefolk:

I respectfully submit that you have all been exceedingly lucky in your workplaces.

Most of us -- at least those of us of a certain age, who have been in the tech industry for decades -- have had the unpleasant experience of working in a company that brought in someone to work on a team who was, for whatever reason, the wrong person. Maybe he was better at making promises about his tech knowledge than actually doing the work. Maybe she was just in over her head, and trying to hide her incompetence, getting the server to sort-of-work for long enough to get it into production. Maybe, as in the case of a recent instance that inspired this article (which Rick and I discussed at length), the guy had been on the job so long that nobody wanted to actually fire his lazy ass, and the "we treat people well" company let the guy stay on well past the point they should. Every time the dude was given an assignment he spent 3 weeks doing something a real expert could accomplish in 3 days, and months later it still had more bugs than there are black flies at a June picnic in Maine.

This isn't about someone acting like an asshole. It's the frustration of people who are personally committed to doing a job right being upset when they have to spend their time cleaning up someone else's messes instead of working on their own stuff. Especially discovering the mess after the fact, when the goddam server that Ben spent so long setting up goes down, and the new sysadmin discovers it was misconfigured, and it's only by pure luck that the company didn't lose two years of data.

None of us are perfect. Right. Got that. Agree. We're not talking about you, you who left a business that had a rectocranial manager. You, who deserve respect even after you're gone.

But some people are toxic in their lack of technical skills. If you're lucky, the team gets rid of that person quickly. But after the turkey is gone -- and really, if it's someone incompetent he is a turkey -- you have to clean up the mess. I asked Rick to write up a list of things to look for, rugs under which incompetence frequently is swept. That's what he did.

by BlackFriday666(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 11:19 AM

LOL  and the incentive for me to give up my unemployment governt transfer check is? 

 

I mean wow, just because I work for you doesn't mean you can refer to me like this.

.. just wait for another national disaster lulz.

I'll be charging eight grand per generator.  120 dollars for 4 gallons of stagnate gasoline.

Meanwhile you will be found dead hanging in your poorly lit parking garage by your necktie as your private security split left because the battery was flooded.

"units, units be advised there is an attempt 211 to arrest now at 938 temple,
938 temple...  subjects with bats.. tryin to get inside the cb's house"

by TorrentFreak(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 11:34 AM

Riots on the streets of Miami,
Oh, Riots on the streets of Chicago,
Oh, on the streets of Long Beach,
Mmm, and San Francisco (Boise Idaho),
Riots on the streets of Kansas City
(Salt Lake, Hunnington Beach, CA),
Tuscalusa Alabama (Arcada Compton Mischigan),
Cleveland Ohio,
Fountain Valley (Texas, Barstow - Let's do this every year),
Bear Mountain, Vista View (Twice a Year),
Eugene OR, Eureka CA (Let it burn, let it burn),
Hesperia (Oh, ya let it burn, wont'cha wont'cha let it burn),
Santa Barbara,Cuyamca, Nevada, (let it burn)
Phoenix Arizona,
San Diego, Lakewood Florida, (let it burn)
Fuckin... 29 palms (wontcha let it burn)

Any units assist 334 willow,
Structure fire, and numerous subjects looting

by Earl(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 01:19 PM

I am honestly not seeing how the author is an asshole. We had an employee who left a mess almost as described in the article. And when he was let got for committing a security breach, we spent over a year cleaning up the mess he had made. We're talking about:

 

1) Machines configured so badly we had to bring them down for an extended period just to fix them.

2) Tasks not done that were claimed to be done

3) Equipment purchased and then hidden away.

4) A total revamp of our security as he had violated security pretty badly.

 

He literally spent more time coverign his tracks than actual work. And in the end it did change how we operate. There is more accountability now so a fast talker like him cannot get away with what he got away with. So there was an upside.

by Ivan(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 02:03 PM

All of your 'cleanup' tasks are down to lack of proper process.

Simply, if code is to go to a 'main'/'development' branch there should be a checklist - at the very least:

a) Code builds without errors and warnings

b) Test suites run without failures

c) Code review completed, e.g.

   1) Patch reviewed by senior dev / ta

   2) Review comments addressed, applied and verified

If blame is to be apportioned, it can hardly be with the employee in question. Especially in an environment where terms like "turkey" are used to descibe people.

by Almost all of you are way too sensitive(anon) on ‎09-11-2012 02:54 PM

I read through this article and found it to be a pretty accurate depiction of what happens in a lot of IT environments.  I have been in IT for 30 years and involved as a service provider for hundreds of companies and sometimes a "turkey" is hired.  I think most of you are missing the point of the article and the upcoming holiday season connection.

Lighten-up and I bet most of you would agree with most of this article if you were witness to as many different problems I have seen over the years at many companies.

 

 

by wedding dresses for mother of the bride(anon) on ‎04-02-2013 12:26 AM

Bald l become more than just no hair ?Bald can be seen today because it is buy lolita clothes online become fashionable and shave so many of her hair off, to take cheap gothic lolita dresses. Not so sch cheap lolita clothes, but if it then comes with bubble acids, cuts or scratches or pimples from the last shave. How it goes without injuries, it was briefly explained gothic lolita.Easier with a good preparatory workYou have a full head of hair, which should yield a bald head, you should reach first for the Clipper. Down with the wool to it as short as m daily is. Small tip you do not advance to the hair c, otherwise the hair swells and it l sst heavier shave off.Women with long hair, should bind them to the braid and this first cut.Also when dealing with the Clipper should be allowed to help, especially when you are first gothic lolita dress to the bald nights.Much time and foamNothing beats shaving cream. The head should thus kr taut Noot be dreamt before one reaches for the sharp blade. The strength and the success is very important, in the rest. Get to shave all the time, you have.please vist:http://www.whatabeautifullife.com.Let soak the foam, which prevents skin irritation and helps to avoid cutting injuries. Whengothic lolita dresses, skin a little tight and shave in the opposite direction.If necessary, repeat the procedure. Only when the head sch n is smoothly shaved, hei t it, to wash away the remaining foam and good to maintain the new lolita clothes.Care afterWithout a good care after shaving, you will certainly get problems with sensitive scalp. So you should apply very much. For this, use a moisturizing cream. Protection against too much sun is a very important point, because now no hairs are more available, protecting your head.With time, a little practice and care much, also you are have fun on your new bald and wear with pride.read more:whatabeautifullife.com.

Post a Comment
Be sure to enter a unique name. You can't reuse a name that's already in use.
Be sure to enter a unique email address. You can't reuse an email address that's already in use.
Type the characters you see in the picture above.Type the words you hear.

The HP Input Output site is sponsored by HP and features articles and content from HP and third-party contributors. Third-party articles and content, while paid for by HP, do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of HP. HP does not endorse this content and is not responsible for its accuracy, availability and quality.

Follow Us
Spotlight
"It's Not My Job" - Handling the Vendor Finger-Pointing Trap Is Teamwork Dead? A Post-Agile Prognosis Improving Your Personal Brand with Social Networking 5 Types of Meetings Every Business Must Explore
┼ Based on energy, paper and toner savings from regular printer usage. Results may vary.